Welcome to the interactive web schedule for the 9th International Deer Biology Congress! For tips on how to navigate this site, visit the "Helpful Info" section. To return to the IDBC website, go to: www.deerbiologycongress.org.

UPDATE: This event has passed. Some presentation slides are available to download. To filter this schedule and view only the talks with slides available, find the "Filter by Type" heading, hover over "Slides Available" and select "Yes." Click on the presentation you’d like to view and then open the attached PDF. 
Monday, August 6 • 3:00pm - 3:20pm
Population Estimation 1 Track: Comparing Two State-space Models for Estimating Dynamics of an Elk Population

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule, view media, leave feedback and see who's attending!

AUTHORS: Lisa J. Koetke, Floyd W. Weckerly – Texas State University

ABSTRACT: Mathematical models can predict how species respond to their environment, and they are a critical tool for global concerns including climate change, population management, pest control, and species conservation. The Gompertz and Ricker state-space models are both commonly used to estimate population parameters of large mammals using population counts, but few studies have compared the utility of these models while accounting for survey imprecision, or observer error. We used elk population abundance data collected by multiple sources in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Hanford site in southcentral Washington between 1983 and 1999 [1, 2, 3]. This dataset was useful since it includes observed counts over a wide range of abundances. We estimated the parameters of the Gompertz and Ricker hierarchical state-space models using Bayesian statistics in the RJAGS package in R. The Gompertz model estimated observer error following a log normal distribution, whereas the Ricker model estimated observer error following a Poisson distribution. When taking into account survey imprecision, the root mean square error of the Ricker hierarchical state-space model was almost half that of the Gompertz model. Furthermore, the projected 95% credible intervals of the Ricker model encompassed all observed counts, whereas 3 of 17 counts lied outside of the projected 95% credible intervals of the Gompertz model. Finally, the Ricker model, but not the Gompertz model, estimated carrying capacity. Therefore, the Ricker model appears to more precisely model population dynamics of this elk population than the Gompertz model when density dependent factors influence fluctuations in abundance.

Monday August 6, 2018 3:00pm - 3:20pm MDT
Long Peaks Lodge - Diamond E&W

Attendees (4)